All Posts By

KS Legal

bnpl system

BNPL System – a Boon or Bane For Millennials?

By Economy, Banking No Comments

BNPL System – a Boon or Bane?

Credit card and EMI companies are in shackles. All thanks to the recent rise of the BNPL system also known as the Buy Now Pay Later system which is taking the millennials and the young generation by storm.

Gone are the days when people used to pay hefty interest on their borrowing, which was compounded monthly and led to hefty debts. Countering such aversive trends, BNPL has tried to mitigate the woes of working-class professionals with its easy credit policy.

BNPL system on based on the idea of fast credit that is becoming the need of the households given the crippled finances due to the pandemic increased medical expenses, and lower incomes.

To top it all, the festive season too is a major reason for overspending and tremendous use of the BNPL in recent times.

buy now pay lager bnpl systemThough one can state that easy credit is the primary reason for the success of the BNPL model, the widespread adaptation of the digital medium around the world for the specific purpose of shopping has also helped BNPL garner much attention around the globe.

Thus, with easy availability through larger internet penetration across the country and easy credit, there has been an immense increase in spending and also a sense of immediate gratification that the BNPL system is offering.

Therefore, with its widespread popularity, one can emphatically state that BNPL has been a tremendous success in recent times.

Having talked about the buyer side, the seller side is experiencing the benefits of the system. This has led various sellers to make the buying process quite seamless for customers by partnering with various financial institutions, thus growing their consumer base at an increasing rate.

buy now pay laterTrouble in paradise?

But with no hidden interest rates or fee structure, the model seems to be too good to be true and makes one raise questions like whether the model really is a boon for the millennials or are we missing out on something?

Sure, one can state that BNPL is a revolutionary innovation for the individual who has a stable income and is trying to cover extra expenses.

But what about the millennials, who are increasing users of the system? Turns out, it isn’t much of a viable option for them.

The mere reason for such a statement is that the BNPL system encourages overspending. Given the no interest rate or fee policy, the usage of the BNPL option for finances seems like an enticing option for many millennials, who might be attracted to it even for small purchases.

With numerous small sprees of spending and shopping, there is a larger threat of piling debts than face the millennials.

Another reason that makes the BNPL system all the more enticing for millennials is the limit set by e-commerce entities.

Amazon has set the limit to Rs. 7,500-10,000. Thus, with no limits being imposed by the BNPL system, alternatives like Amazon pay are not opted for.

Similarly, the BNPL services of the e-commerce platform can only be availed when purchasing an on the platform, which is a major deterrent for its users, who opt for BNPL through different companies that encourage overspending.

Thus, given the aforementioned threat and dangerous enticement that the model offers, as the adoption rate grows, so do the risks with it.

The problem that ultimately crops up is that while people are largely aware of how this system works, many are quite unaware of the consequences of late payments.

Thus, no matter how many advantages, one cannot overlook the fact that it emphatically promotes consumer debt through overspending or impulse purchasing.

To add to the narrative, it is to be noted that the interest rates are generally not bound by any consumer credit regulations. Thus, welfare, in the end, can be comprised.

The target audience

bnpl modelGiven that millennials are at the risk of exploitation and huge debt what audience can actually benefit from the scheme of easy credit?

It can be stated that the system makes quite some sense for B2B e commerce platforms that can emphatically and effectively provide enhanced BNPL services to their customers to increase their sales.

On the other hand, Wholesalers too who are trying to procure high-priced merchandise or products in bulk can avail the easy credit policy. Similarly, retailers and businesses that procure products or materials before the sale have a large potential to benefit from the scheme.

The future

It is no news that the finances of the economies around the world have been crippled by the pandemic. Thus, as the economies reel from the impacts of the pandemic, one can emphatically state that the future of BNPL firms is unknown.

But given the aforementioned narrative, it can be maintained that the risk of such services remains quite daunting and real for a certain set of customers like millennials.

With the economy still in the nascent stage of recovery, another debt bubble will not materialize well for the economy in the future.

Though in the dystopian world of debt, one can weasel his or her way out by assuring that they save up enough to pay the price of the product in the future.

bnpl services

It is to be noted that fact that BNPL services are relatively a new reform and haven’t reached a wider audience like credit cards and EMI also cannot be denied.

Even though the millennials may be in frenzy about the new, emerging credit option, one cannot deny the fact that the demand for it is likely to go up in the future.

This will especially be true after its robust performance this festive season.


Tags: buy now pay later, bnpl model, digital medium, bnpl services, b2b e commerce platforms, bnpl firms, consumer buying process, bnpl business model, buy now pay later bnpl, buy now pay later business model.

oyo rooms ipo

After Zostel, FHRAI is The Newest Abrasive Hurdle in OYO Rooms IPO.

By Hospitality, Economy No Comments

FHRAI Abrasive Hurdle in OYO Rooms IPO

Trouble has been brewing in OYO’s rooms IPO world as, after Zostel, the Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Association of India has effectively and emphatically urged the Securities and Exchange Board of India to suspend the IPOs proposal for Initial public offering.

Given the ripe market for India’s startup culture, with various mind-blowing IPOs being launched, OYO’s path to being a public entity is fraught with difficulties.

But on what grounds are objections being raised against OYO’s ambitious vision of entering the IPO market? In various pleas, it has been adamantly stated, that OYO has not adequately disclosed everything in its draft prospectus.

Such claims against Oravel come on the grounds of unfair practices and how it is effectively resorting to unfair, fraudulent, and anti-competitive practices and dealings.

These include claims that point toward the narrative of entering into anti-competitive agreements by Zostel to capture the market and abuse its dominant position.

To top off all the anti-competitive narrative that has been demonstrated and articulated by the FHRAI, claims over inadequate disclosures of critical court cases and the valuation of the company have been raised too.

According to the reports, it has been claimed that all the valuation that has been disclosed is not sound or feasible.

Given the humungous amount of backing the company wants to raise, amounting to around a whopping Rs 8,430 crore through an IPO, such hurdles do not seem trivial or less maligning.

Such claims by FHRAI do not speak well of OYO’s growth model which is facing resistance in its very first stage of growth.

The seriousness of the claims can be conjured from the fact that the anti-competitive claims made by FHRAI against Oravel are being investigated and scrutinized by the Competition Commission of India.

oyo ipoThe CCI’s investigation had commenced after a preliminary hearing. According to the reports, the investigation will be directed by the Director-General.

But what do such claims and complaints registered under CCI by FHRAI mean for OYO? It is to be noted that exposure to such a discrepancy can unveil the possibility of a penalty that can be levied effectively by CCI. In fact, CCI also has the power to direct behavioral changes that need to be undertaken.

This can effectively and emphatically have a tumultuous effect on the anti-competitive practices being engaged by Oravel.

Given the aforementioned situation, it would not be an understatement to state that allegations of such levels, with CCI involvement and investigations by the Director-General, can heavily lead to panic amongst investors.

The market is highly speculative that runs on news and environment rather than rationale. Thus, given the recent maligning of the image, it can possibly set a very bad precedent for OYO and help develop a prejudice against the company.

What sets aside OYO’s case more than any other is the fact that to date there has not been a single case where a company that is being investigated by the Director-General of the CCI for anti-competitive practices has been actually permitted to initiate an IPO by the SEBI. For OYO, this can definitely not martialize well.

On top of all the allegations that have been made by the FHRAI, it has also claimed that the company has attempted to avoid a large number of contractual payment obligations.

Such a claim can prove to be the last nail in OYO’s coffin as such contractual payment obligations were to be made towards hotels that are members of the travel body.

In a fiery statement, the FHRAI has even brought Interim Resolution Professional into the picture, where over 113 claimants have registered claims of Rs 160 crore with it. On top of it, OYO again has not disclosed the matter in its filings.

Thus, it can be effectively stated that the cumulative effect of such litigation will not materialize well for the future financial health of Oravel.

Talking about all the corporate discrepancies what about the criminal ones? It might come as a shock to many but the company has been alleged to not disclose the various criminal investigations that are effectively pending against it.

These include its directors and promoters along with its subsidiaries.

oyo ipo newsAll this comes after Zostel’s efforts to plague OYO rooms IPO dream. It is to be noted that the former rival namely, Zostel, is in a more than five-year-long legal battle with OYO.

Thus the recent happenings have led the IPO festivities to be suspended till the discrepancies have been thoroughly scrutinized and examined. According to the reports, this has been done to effectively protect the interest of all the stakeholders as well as the general public.

As aforementioned, OYO’s path to its realization of the IPO dream was already fraught with Zostel. This is due to the fact that even it had approached the market regulator to halt OYO’s IPO earlier this month.

fhrai hotels and oyo rooms ipo

The grounds of its allegation were based on the company’s capital structure, which it claimed was not final. In addition, filing of the DRHP was effectively illegal, in relation to the litigation between OYO and Zostel.

Thus, will OYO be able to overcome the blatant uncertainty and be able to stand its ground in such adverse situations? Given the revelations and the uncertain circumstances, it will be interesting to watch how the case plays out in the future.


Tags: fhrai, ipo, oyo ipo, oyo ipo news, ipo oyo, oyo ipo valuation, oyo rooms ipo, ipo of oyo, oyo hotels ipo, fhrai institute of hospitality management, fhrai hotels.

privacy and ai

Privacy and AI: Myth

By Others No Comments

Privacy and AI

Privacy and AI can be a very interesting development for civilization and various sectors. But with the rise of AI technology, there are a definite number of detestable attribute that is attached to the contentious technology.

It is no news that machine learning has immensely revolutionized every niche that it has encountered. This niche involves finance, website development, healthcare, or digital security.

Given that the lives during the pandemic have been altered, usage of technology and hence AI technology is on a rise. But it is to be noted that under usage and over usage of the same can lead to catastrophic circumstances and scenarios.

privacy and ai mythWhat is worth mentioning here is that AI was developed to provide assistance to civilization and reduce its labor. Coupled with its affirmative attributes, AI was also designed to provide significant privacy to media users.

The advent of such a technology was crucial, given the immense rise of online exploitation and money fraud.

Such technology was quite evident to even a normal citizen who witnessed that videos on YouTube or posts on their news feeds were blurred, or certain texts or a person’s face were strategically blurred to protect them from harm and exploitation. Well, that is exactly how digital privacy was ensured for users by using such simple technologies.

But quite detestably such technological advancement does not guarantee digital privacy that cannot be breached easily.

Such a claim has also been corroborated by the advent of technology that has been developed by a team of researchers at the University of Texas.

It is worth mentioning here that the software that has been developed by the team of researchers can easily and quite effectively breach the privacy of a user as its software is designed to easily identify the sensitive content that is strategically hidden behind pixelated images.

Now as we know such pixelated images can contain someone’s identity, house, or vehicle number, therefore the advent of such technology is definitely cancer for the AI technology’s impressiveness and working methods. Thus, this invariably proves that digital security is not as infallible as we may think it to be.

rise of aiInterestingly enough, according to reports the team hasn’t been successful in using some state-of-the-art technology to do it but has instead ironically used machine Learning methods. Such machine learning methods have been used to train neural networks. This effectively means that it has not been programmed but on the contrary, the computer has been fed with large volumes of sample images to breach the data privacy of users.

The Mechanism Used

Firstly, the team effectively uses machine learning to breach the digital privacy of the users. This is done by feeding neural networks with data sets of various blurred images. The mechanism works as the neural network sees more faces, objects, words, and faces; it invariably gets better at its recognition skills. This allows it to get better recognition and achieve good accuracy in identifying objects. Once about 90 percent of the recognition is done, the neural network is fed significantly with blurred versions of the images used to scrutinize the feasibility. This is what leads the neural network to effectively learn to distinguish between the original and the blurred images.

The last step is to witness and effectively scrutinize how accurately the software has recognized the given image, once the former learning process is complete, the neural networks are effectively exposed to an entire set of new images to recheck.

Now it is to be noted that the advent of such odious technology, the rise of AI, and data privacy is a myth. With its burgeoning data breaching power, it has given rise to apprehension amongst its users. As the digital economy is on the rise due to the pandemic, user confidence in digital security is the prerequisite demand for the success of such technology.

But it would be quite inaccurate to state that AI is significantly plagued with only disadvantages. AI technology has effectively both an upside and downside. Given the extent of its advantages in the healthcare, finance, and banking sector, such a technology is too crucial to be set aside or ignored.

Its greater usage has been witnessed in the social media industry where this technology can be incorporated into image-editing software. Such technology leads to the quality of images being restored while zooming.

It can also be effectively argued that such a technology is also a holy grail for the security measures in society. This is due to the fact that the same technology can effectively provide high-resolution images of suspicious vehicles. Such technological and security advancements can lead to advancement in proceedings and tackling of crime when such information is presented to the concerned organizations.

On the other hand, it is to be noted that AI can effectively also lead to changing the dynamics of digital security and privacy. Though certain despicable aspects develop countering the effectiveness of the AI technology, the AI technology also gets updated and prepared to deal with the same.

digital privacy

Thus, it can be effectively stated that as the influence of Machine Learning will grow, its exploiters will grow too. Therefore, adaption throughout should be included in the development of future technologies in the field of privacy. This should be done to incorporate flexibility in the system and to give out a message that no technology is foolproof, and it needs to be enhanced by doing a continuous analysis of the same.

Thus, given the aforementioned reasons and advantages of AI technology, it is definitely high time that we modernized the privacy-preserving methods. More effectively this needs to be done before the Machine Learning techniques turn the very significant idea of digital privacy into a myth.


Tags: rise of ai, digital privacy, pixelated images, data privacy in ai, data privacy ai, digital data privacy, user data privacy, ai and data privacy, rise of ai in recent years.

regulation of artificial intelligence

Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Platform: A Challenge

By Others No Comments

Regulation of Artificial Intelligence

Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Platform: It is a sector that has great potential in the future. With its consistent and rational functioning, it can quite rightly be stated as the most consistent choice for certain future rational assessments. 

But nevertheless, algorithmic decision-making is increasingly proving to be potentially discriminatory.  This has been corroborated in various instances of EU anti-discrimination law that is well equipped with an appropriate doctrinal tool kit.

This arduous algorithm decision-making is quite particularly true in view of the legal recognition of indirect discrimination.  

legal regulation of artificial intelligenceBut on the other hand, Artificial intelligence has a great potential to transform business around the various spectrum.  But its benefits have been certainly more apparent in the IT, banking, healthcare, and media industry. This is due to the fact that all these sectors are technology-intensive sectors. 

EU has already started to strengthen its grip on the market, especially the digital industry, including business-to-business applications. And it is worth mentioning that AI actually possesses various fine qualities. 

This is due to the fact that AI, with its rational and consistent assessment, helps people with improved health care. This attribute can be coupled with safer cars and other transport systems that can be the future of civilization.

Also given the importance of cost-induced services, AI can particularly provide tailored, longer-lasting, and cheaper products and services, that can be quite crucial for the business environment.

Apart from the business or manufacturing sector, AI can further facilitate access to education,  information, and training.

It is no news that distance learning, given the pandemic, has become more and more crucial. 

On the other hand, AI can definitely make the workplace much safer as robots can be effectively used for dangerous parts of jobs, which humans are not comfortable taking up. 

 In the legal sector too AI has been predicted to be used more in the criminal justice system and the crime prevention system. This is due to the fact that massive data sets can invariably be processed faster with the use of AI.  

But given the aforementioned affirmations in support of the AI do not guarantee that the AI system is infallible.  This effectively also means that the burgeoning reliance on the AI system will also pose a greater potential risk across various sectors.

regulation on artificial intelligenceIt is to be noted that the underuse of AI technology can be outrightly considered foolish and a major threat. This is especially true in the situation of the EU which cannot miss opportunities in the domain of poor implementation of major programs.

These programs can include deals like the EU Green Deal and especially the loss of competitive advantage towards other parts of the world.

Thus, given its immense usage, one cannot deny that its usage cannot be ceased completely. But to manage it is over usage regulatory framework is required. 

This is due to the fact that over-usage is also problematic. Like used to solve and analyze various complex issues of the society can only lead to devastation. 

 such a question is all the more pertinent if we have to decide who will bear the responsibility for the AI debacle? This is increasingly important given the rise of self-driving cars. To quote an example, recently Tesla’s self-driving car hit a person during its test drive.  Thus, this gives rise to questions like should the damage be covered by the owner or should the car manufacturer, company, or the programmer be to be reprimanded.

But if the producer was to be held accountable for the same, there might be no incentive to provide such good product, service, or innovation. Furthermore,  it can definitely damage people’s trust in the technology.  Thus, given the damage that AI technology can cost, it is quite suiting that regulations are placed strategically in the economy. But on the other hand, such regulations could also be stifling and strict in regard to innovation.

Not only are the accidents that prove to be a threat to the AI technology but its design and data can be intentionally or unintentionally biased towards its users.

For example, as aforementioned,  some important aspects of the issue might not be effectively programmed into the algorithm which can lead to bias. Or on the other hand, structural racism and bias can be a reflection of the structural biases in the society, given they had been programmed.

Thus, such detestable attribute of AI technology needs to be strategically altered.  This is more and more important as if not done properly, AI could effectively lead to decisions that can be heavily influenced by data on sex, age, ethnicity, and race when hiring or firing.

This can also be true in the context of criminal proceedings and offering loans. Thus a cautious approach is the need of the hour.

 this can effectively lead to odious situations where such imbalances of the AI technology can be misused by the miscreants in society. 

artificial intelligence regulation

Also, given that AI can be biased selective content can be visualized and shown which can lead to the spread of misinformation and false narratives in society.

This can again be craft fully exploited in society. A very comprehensive example of the same can be that based on a person’s online behavior that can be studied and collected without their knowledge can lead the political campaigners to adapt their message and lead to the setting up of the demagoguery in the society. 

Thus, though AI might have some fascinating facets to it it is quite true that it can be quite destructive for society given the huge capacity of the power that it can wield in the future.

Thus, strategic and structural regulations are required. On the other hand, over usage of AI technology can also lead to the nemesis of civilization.  Thus, though AI may be interesting its regulation is certainly complex.  


Tags: regulating ai, regulation of artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence platform, ai regulation, ai regulation eu, artificial intelligence law regulation, ai regulations around the world, regulation on artificial intelligence, regulation artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence laws and regulations, artificial intelligence regulation, legal regulation of artificial intelligence.

esop benefits for employees

SEBI’s New ESOP Based Benefits For Employees

By Labour & Employment, Others No Comments

SEBI’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan – New ESOP Benefits For Employees

SEBI’s Issue of ESOP  Regulations in 2002 and SEBI’s Share Based Employee Benefit 2014 were effectively notified in 2002 and 2014 respectively.

It is to be noted that the Sweat Equity regulations had emphatically provided an elaborate efficient framework for the issuance of Sweat Equity shares by various listed companies.

new esop benefits for employees

On the other hand, the SBEB Regulations introduced the framework to regulate Employee Stock Option Scheme. This also led to the introduction of other share-based employee benefits for employees and the Employee Stock Purchase Scheme benefits.

With various recommendations and suggestions from the stakeholders, the SEBI constituted an Expert group to give recommendations in order to further streamline the provisions of these regulations.

The recommendations from the Expert Group made several emphatic and significant policy recommendations which included effectively combining both the regulations. These regulations combined were the Sweat equity regulations and the SBEB regulations.

This led SEBI to present the proposal to effectively merge and amend the Share Based Employee Benefits Regulations of 2014 and the Issue of Sweat Equity Regulations of 2002 into a single regulation. This single regulation came to be known as Share Based Employee Benefits and Sweat Equity Regulations of 2021.

The regulations that have been provided for regulation of all employee benefit schemes of the company and the sweat equity shares have been done to help employees to involve in dealing in shares, either directly or indirectly.

This has been emphatically done to effectively and significantly facilitate the smooth operation of such schemes by the employees and for their convenience. But this doesn’t mean that the regulations have been made less vigilant and stringent. In fact, the newer regulations have been promulgated keeping in mind to prevent any possible manipulation or any other matter connected with the Securities and Exchange Board of India.

sebi esop regulationsWhat Does The Law State?

It is to be noted that the provisions of these regulations will effectively apply to the employee stock purchase scheme, stock option scheme, stock appreciation rights, retirement benefits scheme, and many more. Moreover, the promulgated regulations shall effectively be applied to any company whose equity shares have been listed on a recognized stock exchange in India. It will be also applicable to companies that seek to effectively issue sweat equity shares or has a stipulated scheme for the direct or indirect benefit of employees.

The Employee Stock Ownership Plan Benefits

The changes had led the Securities and Exchange Board of India to significantly relax the minimum vesting period. This requirement was changed for the employee stock option plan in the event of the death of an employee of a company.

 as per various scrutinization and speculations, such regulations are effectively aimed at providing relief to the families of the deceased employees of the various listed companies. This has been done to provide assistance and benefits to the deceased employees’ families in times of the covid already has crippled the financial standing of many in India. As per the regulation, the recommended relaxation would effectively be available to all the employees who have deceased on or after April 01, 2020.

 to provide financial backing to various families in India, Sebi’s rules have effectively stated that there should be a minimum vesting period of at least one year. This has been done in accordance with employee stock options and stock appreciation rights. Also, as aforementioned, it also states that in the event of death of any employee in any listed company, the benefits of SAR or any other benefit that had been previously granted to the employee under a scheme will be vested in the legal heirs or nominees of the deceased employee.

employee stock ownership plan benefits Secondly, the newer SBEB Regulations will be effectively applied to all permanent employees of a company. Thus, the range of applicability has been widened. In the previous regulations, these employees also included employees of the holding company or the subsidiary of such a company that could have effectively been working in or outside of India.

Thus, it was a system where an employee that was in dual employment could have widely partaken in the share-based benefit scheme.

Thus, such a benefit could have been availed from either its subsidiary company or the holding company. However, in the recent amendments of the 2021 regulations, the scheme now only applies to employees who are exclusively working for a company.

Now the exclusive company here means that the employee could even be working exclusively for a group company of such company.

On the other hand, further amendment shows that independent directors will effectively not be eligible to participate under the equity-based benefit schemes. But several clarifications have been provided that non-executive directors would be effectively and significantly be eligible to participate in such schemes.

A series of other welcome changes that has been emphatically brought about by SEBI in its 2021 amendment law is that it has provided an increase in the time limit for appropriating inventory.

Under the recently amended regulations, if a company has effectively implemented a stock appreciation rights scheme that significantly involves purchasing shares from the market via trust, then the time limit has been increased from 1 financial year to 2 financial years.

employee stock option planThe benefit of the same is that this will significantly give companies sufficient time to identify employees. This identification of employees will include those employees to whom grants can be made while making the purchase of the shares of the company (via the trust) at an opportune time.

Thus, the short-term benefits of the amendment look quite promising but what the future holds is still a mystery.


Tags: sebi esop regulations, esop sebi, employee stock ownership program, employee stock option plan, employee stock ownership plan, employee stock ownership,
employee stock ownership plan benefits, share based employee benefits, advantages of esop to employees, esop to employees, esop benefits for employees

ipo season

The Rise of the IPO Season in India

By Economy, Others No Comments

IPO Season 2021 in India

India in recent months has been witnessing spectacular, blockbuster IPO debuts. The debuts are being made by some of the very leading companies like Zomato, Nykaa, Mrs. Bector, Happiest Minds, Burger King, etc.

Thus, it can be rightfully stated that such robust IPOs are ushering in a new era of realizing the full potential of the startup culture in India.

ipo season 2021

Like the western countries, the startup culture in India is booming. This fact can be corroborated by pieces of evidence of astonishing IPOs being carried out in the market, the great pompous that surrounds them, and the public’s willingness to invest leading to overvalued stock.

It can be seen that the market is bullish, so much so that Zomato, which was a loss-making company, had its stock overvalued in the market with quite some buzz that was created around its name.

But, here it is worth mentioning that Zomato has emphatically ushered in the IPO season 2021.

An online food tech company going for an IPO in a competitive market sparked much confidence in others. thus, Zomato’s first step and Indian stock markets that are quite bullish this year emphatically led to the country’s emerging tech startups effectively gearing up their confidence.

This confidence was geared up encouragingly knocking on the doors of the public markets.

ipo debuts It is to be known, that 2021 isn’t the only year that saw a burgeoning IPO, 2020 too ended with two hot techs IPOs, but in the US stock market.

These were namely Airbnb and DoorDash. Thus, it can be rightfully stated that the amazing, gratifying success of these IPOs surely had an impact on the Indian investors.

On the other hand, this also led to the strengthening of their belief in technology startups.

 Thus, it is quite stratifying to decipher that the Indian IPO market has finally realized and deciphered the great potential of startups. These startups can be said to have been disrupting traditional ways of business.

One can also say that such a hunger in the market can be due to the burgeoning profits that such companies had earned during the pandemic. the avarice of such gains can also be a driving force to garner a large market share in different segments.

It is to be noted that 2020 and 2021 were unconventional years. With lockdowns and restrictions plaguing the economy, unusual and unconventional ways of business paved the way for the conducting of business activities.

On the other hand, the high exuberance in the market which made Zomato’s IPO an amazing success has inspired many to go for the same. This claim can be corroborated by the fact that all the recent IPOs, be it Zomato, CAMs, Route Mobile, Burger King, and Happiest Minds have all been effectively oversubscribed many times over and debuted with high multiples.

The government

But given the recent boom in the market, how is the Indian government coping with the recent, newfound mechanism of profit that is unfolding in the startup culture? It is to be noted that the Indian government seems to be, quite cheerfully, welcoming such tech IPOs.

In fact, India’s market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has effectively set up an Innovators Growth Platform. On the other hand, it has encouraged, through its recently announced consultation paper, that it is seeking comments for the new rules that will emphatically encourage startups to head for IPO.

 It is to be noted that companies opt for IPOs when their investors, who throughout their funding process need an exit.

ipo market

Thus, given the circumstances and the trend in the IPO market, it can be rightfully stated that there are certain healthy tailwinds that are emphatically pushing startups towards IPO. The IPOs in the market are moving towards fundraising and to emphatically provide investors, as aforementioned, with a healthy exit.

But this gives rise to a pertinent, inquisitive query, what norms or regulations are actually supporting such techs to opt for IPOs?

It is to be noted that new norms that were announced by the SEBI are the answer. Its newer norms have provided regulations and framework for easier migration to the mainboard, special rights that come with IPO, and decreased holding period. Such norms are definitely making launching IPOs more lucrative in the market.

Also, the market is doing its magic as usual. With the cautious approach of the RBI and yields low in the bond market, many investors have moved to the stock market to incur high profits.

ipo market 2021

This is the very emphatic reason that IPOs are overvalued and are being sold at a higher price with so much buzz around them. The main contributor to the same has been the financial literacy that has grown in developing countries like India, which has also contributed its part.

Thus, lastly, it can be stated that the IPO market is on the boom right now with various tech companies opting for healthy financing. But how long will the exuberance surrounding the IPO season last, is something we will have to wait and decipher.


Tags: ipo debuts, startup culture in india, ipo market, rise ipo, ipo market watch, ipo market 2021,
ipo season, ipo grey market, ipo season 2021

rise of nft

The Rise of NFT Market

By Others No Comments

Rise of NFT Market

Rise of NFT: It is no news that the digital economy is on the rise. The era of the digital economy was effectively ushered by the pandemic. The digital transformation took place rapidly which was mainly due to the compulsion faced by many individuals to work in their remote surroundings.

Not only cryptocurrency but the rise of the broader digital asset industry was also witnessed. Thus, with the rise of cryptocurrency, the rise the popularity of non-fungible tokens has also been seen. It is to be noted that according to various reports a total of more than $208 million of NFT artwork had been sold. Given its recent nature, it is quite extraordinary that it has recorded such a humungous growth.

This also corroborates the fact that NFT is on the rise and is just in its nascent stage of development, mustering all the growing popularity in the global market. Since the onset of the pandemic some $250 million worth of total NFT volume has been traded. This data was collected for just one year i.e.2020. This effectively shows that even with economic uncertainty and financial crippling of many, NFT trade is on the rise.

The NFT model has been immensely helping various sectors that are looking for alternatives to monetize their businesses. In addition, creative artists are effectively utilizing NFTs to significantly generate revenues for their creative works. It is to be noted that concerts and music festivals were not held due to the onset of the pandemic, but many artists around the world have enthusiastically used the novel methods of monetizing their creative work by selling in the form of NFTs.

A very appropriate example of the same is the music brand, Kings of Leon, releasing its new album as a limited edition NFT. The sale of just six NFTs has provided lifetime tickets to front-row seats for the band’s shows in the future.

It is to be noted that NFTs that are digital creative works are actually premised on blockchains which work quite similarly to crypto. Blockchain technology which is quite permanent and has unchangeable digital ledgers provides the user the security of recorded transactions that reveal history. It is to be noted that this has led to growing confidence in the industry which secures transactions for future issues and gives effective ownership of NFTs to the rightful owners.

It is to be noted that before the invention or emphatic use of the NFTs the creators were facing limitations for their revenue. But now with the rise of the NFTs, an infinite number of copies can be made of their digital creative works and can be distributed throughout the internet to generate humongous revenue.

This gives rise to the question that how do NFTs make it possible for creators to generate and distribute their artwork that cannot be plagiarized? It is to be noted that the finite tokenized versions of these digital creative works ensure their uniqueness and make the attempt to counterfeit scarce. this helps the artists to preserve the uniqueness of their work.

Additionally, the NFTs cannot be replicated which insures the creators of her work. Thus, given the robust base of the establishment of the NFTs, it can be rightfully stated that excitement relating to NFTs is growing exponentially in the global market.

But given all the favorable attributes of the NFTs, their legal treatment and regulation are somewhat unsettled. As aforementioned that the royalties and uniqueness of the work are preserved through NFT trading, it is to be noted that this might not always be true. Smart contracts are written into the code of NFTs. This invariably allows for the distribution of funds in the form of royalties that the creator receives each time his or her work is resold.

However, this is applicable and works only when the NFT resale is done through the same platform. To add to the arduous attribute of the NFT, US law does not effectively recognize resale rights. These resale rights are unrecognized and are in relation to the creative works. Thus, this nonrecognition of the resale attribute of the NFT means that no law provides recourse for unpaid resale royalties.

Given the exuberant rise of the NFT market, people from all walks of life are participating in the NFT market. But given various legal restrictions, many are unaware of the same. This usually leads to odious infringement liability. Thus, lastly, it can be stated that the introduction of NFTs has great potential to emphatically influence and usher in the digital revolution in the economy.

Its usage has led many artists to earn their due during the failing pandemic period and can be used in the future too making the transition to the digital world more prominent.

Additionally, not the conventional arts being monetized but also the creators can also monetize against other unconventional physical properties and can gain proof, scarcity and uniqueness, ownership of digital assets. However, it is to be noted that the NFT market is still in its nascent stage of development.


Tags: nft market, digital economy, rise of nft, the digital economy, nft marketplace bsc, internet economy, bsc nft market, best nft market, nft marketplace on bsc, crypto nft market

gst rise in india

What Will Be The GST Rise in India For Multinationals Means?

By Economy, Others No Comments

GST Rise in India For Multinationals

India is a country where multinationals usually find their future quite uncertain and rapidly changing. Given the democracy that India is, with a government that considers regulation as its strong suit, such a thing can be expected. In the latest turn of events, the tax department in India has targeted or rather pointed towards the new regime of taxes that can be levied on the multinational fast food and hotel chains and tech companies. These are those multinationals or tech companies that effectively operate through the model of the franchisee in India.

But what part of their income has come under the taxmen’s lenses this time? Under scrutiny, this time is the royalty income of such multinationals. Here, the indirect tax department has emphatically raised questions on the pertinent nature of the agreement of these multinationals with their franchisees. It is here to be noted that the income tax department is effectively demanding higher GST given the nature of agreements that have been signed between the multinationals and the franchise.
But this might give rise to a pertinent question how is a multinational different from its own franchise? The answer is that it isn’t. it is here to be noted that under these franchisee models the multinationals allow Indian companies to actually operate them. These could lead to the management of hotels, entities, and stores by Indian companies under their global brand name. Against this arrangement or franchise model, these multinational companies charge a percentage of profit or you can effectively call them royalty or any other income.

But is this amount paid invariably? Not quite. This royalty tax that is being earned by these multinationals comes under the regulatory ambit of the Indian authorities. According to reports, most multinationals pay up to 12% Goods and Services Tax on such royalties. But, given the present scrutinization, the tax department is emphatically is trying to impose an 18% GST on such royalties.

Why such scrutinization?

The alleged revised GST collection of tax leads to a pertinent question what gave rise to such an analysis? It is to be noted that higher tax is being sought as the GST for payments that come under the “right to use” of the brand name is a mere 12 percent, but when this is compared to “transfer of the right to use”, the GST tax rate is actually18 percent. Thus, all the multinationals that were paying the applicable GST of 12% were because they claimed that they had not transferred the brand name or had effectively allowed the Indian entities to use their brand name permanently.

gst rise in india meansThis mainly comes due to the controversy that prevails between the terms ’use rights’ and ’transfer of use rights. What actually leads to the discrepancy is that the tax department actually considers taxing both categories differently.

It is to be also noted that in India, not one but several multinational companies effectively operate under varied franchise models.

One other characteristic that is responsible for the taxman’s lenses on the multinationals is that most multinational chains mainly fast-food chains, tend to operate in grant microgeographic-based exclusivity. This effectively means that various franchise stalls can be installed at various geographical locations. Not only the fast-food franchise works or operates on this model, but mobile phone companies also try to adopt similar franchise models in terms of “exclusive brand stores” or “app stores”.

The tax department alleges that such models that are usually adopted by multinationals are used to essentially save taxes and escape the tax ambit of India. On the other hand, the tax department effectively wants to want to scrutinize the multinationals using the hardcore principles of “entity over form”.

As per the reports the newer taxes can also be levied on the software companies. Such a tax that can be levied on the multinationals will effectively lead to ambiguity in the Indian tax law that cannot be too accommodative for foreign investments. Given that India is currently recuperating from the covid debacle, FDIs are crucial for momentum.

What makes this matter even more intricate is that in this situation it is very crucial to firstly distinguish between goods, effectively known as permanent transfer, and service, known as a temporary transfer.

As aforementioned, this could materialize into a thorny issue as tax applicability is a sensitive issue for the multinationals that effectively operate in countries where such high taxes can be skipped. India being the most sought-after investment destination can put many multinationals in troubled waters with its uncertain tax laws regulating them.

gst tax rateIt is not the first time that the Indian tax department has touched upon this sensitive issue. Previously, the Indirect Tax Department had beseeched or inquired some multinational corporations and foreign banks whether they will allow their entities and subsidiaries to use the brand name. Consequently, in the interest of the Indian entities, the inquiry was made into whether compensation had been duly paid for the use of the brand by a subsidiary.

For a long time, now many multinational companies and foreign banks have been under the tax department scanners. However, the issue was not carried forward due to the pandemic disrupting the functioning of the department. But with now the situation stabilized, the Income Tax department is ready for its sleuthing. What will be the future of the multinationals in India will be something we will decipher only in the future.


Tags: gst rise, tax department in india, new tax regime, income tax department, royalty tax, gst tax rate, gst percentage, tax regime, gst rise in india, gst slabs, gst for multinationals

competition law in india

Why Tech Startups Should Worry As India Strengthens Its Competition Law

By Corporate Law, Others No Comments

Why Tech Startups in India Worry About Competition Law

Competition Law: It is quite undeniable to state that an individual’s life revolves around new tech especially given the odious times of the pandemic. with its increased usage in our daily lives, companies like Facebook and Google seem to be omnipresent. Thus the influence they present on anybody’s life is tremendous and sometimes unwarranted.

This especially presents a problem for the individual if such an undeniably tremendous power goes unchecked and unregulated. Given the burgeoning influence it has on society and the catastrophic circumstances it might have in the future given the spread of fake information, the Government has taken matters into its own hand. This has led to the initiation of newer regulations and rules with regard to competition.

These laws are more geared to deal with the burgeoning, unchecked power of big tech firms. It can, in fact, be stated that such laws are being passed to curtail the growing influence and power of the big techs.

Historical Development of The MRTP Act

the monopolies and restrictive trade practices law was passed in 1962 to regulate and curtail the monopolistic trade in the Indian economy. It is here to be noted that initially it was initially had a socialistic character and did not apply to the public sectors.

It was due to this attribute of non-regulation of the public-owned entities like the banks, corporations, etc. that led to the passage of the Competition Act in 2002. Its main objective was to emphatically deal with anti-competitive agreements. In compliance, it also wanted to end the abuse of a dominant position and the acquisitions in the economy.

But what actually led to the debacle of the MRTP act? It was mainly due to the inefficiency that had crept into the system due to bias that had seeped into the system. It had led to a bias against the private sector which wasn’t quite accommodating. On the other hand, the liberalization in 1991 had shaken the foundation of the robust MRTP structure in the Indian economy. It was also perhaps due to a lack of clarity on a variety of definitions that made it quite ambiguous.  

Thus with liberalization in trade, robust competition law was effectively needed as trade and competition are effectively intertwined. But this also meant that Competition laws had effectively monitored the cutthroat competition that was presented by the foreign corporations to promote healthy competition and protect consumer interest. 

competition law in indiaIt is to be noted that with increasing Competition law regulation, the system has become reductant and crippling. It with its regulatory authority has started to emphatically affect the tech companies in big ways in order to regulate their size and market dominance.

In fact, internationally, the authority of Google and  Microsoft has been challenged. Coupled with it the Indian authorities have also invariably placed allegations against Flipkart and Amazon for their increasing discount sales in the economy. On the other hand, allegations have been filed against Facebook for renewing it’s it investment with Reliance Jio.

Though the government in India is emphatically trying to control the competition and monopoly in India, its measures are increasingly becoming reluctant.

It is to be noted that free trade is itself a competition regulator where the inefficient move out of the market. With extra ostentatious and complex competition laws for a developing country, these are usually crippling. Competition laws are a luxury for the developed country that developing countries like India can ill afford.

On the other hand, the government’s new attitude towards regulating the big tech firms has been strongly reflected in the new amendment bill of 2020. This emphatically molds and changes the regulatory structure of the CCI in restructuring procedures for effectively regulating the guidelines. The new bill also increasingly seeks to expand the Act to invariably and quite detestably include the digital markets.

A recent example of the same is the heavy regulations that have been proposed for the arrangement and buyers cartel. With various reductant measures to regulate the digital world with the chief compliance officer and a series of measures, inefficiency is bound to seep in.

With the increasing popularity of the tech companies and corporations, it has been seen that how the tech world is increasingly dealing with the cases such as the ola uber pricing issue and the other google antitrust allegations.

Talking about the mergers laws and the applicability of the competition laws, it is to be noted that the current merger control framework is traditional and hence reductant as CCI approval is needed if the two companies involved in the merger cross a certain limit of assets and turnover thresholds. But given the nature of the tech firms, these are very asset-light and might actually not earn revenue for many years.

This is due to the fact that the company’s more immediate goals are to expand and gain a consumer base in the market. Thus, this might lead to overlooking high-value transactions that might escape scrutiny.  

In fact, the regulation of the digital framework regulation by just CCI will not help. This is due to the fact that it might also require the help of a data protection bill and more importantly the broadcast company of India. Thus, the increasing number of regulations is not the need of the hour but the accommodation of the same is. 


competition law in india, cci approval, competition act 2002, competition policy, competition act, anti competitive agreements, competition law, competition law and policy, monopoly laws, competition policy international, antitrust and competition law, anti competition law

hospitality business

Investment in The Hospitality Business Dries Up Due To Regulatory and Covid Concerns

By Hospitality, Others No Comments

Hospitality Business Dries Up Due To Regulatory & COVID

It is no news that the pandemic has taken the world by storm. The economies around the world have kneeled under the pressure of economic disparities and havoc that were inflicted on their growth. Many countries saw an unprecedented contraction, of which India was effectively one of the worst-hit counties which had been hard hit by the pandemic.

But the effects and spread of the devastation caused by the pandemic were unevenly spread across various sectors. It can be rightly stated that these were effectively exacerbated in some sectors like hospitality and MSME sectors that are contacted intensive sectors.

 As the virulent and highly recurring COVID-19 spread across the entire world, the primary and sole focus of the businesses and governments got diverted towards the safety of the public. Though such measures will be continued in the long run, implications for economic growth have been severe. This is due to the fact that the sharp corporate profits have effectively led to a sharp sell-off in equity markets across the globe. It is to be noted that there has been an immense impact on both supply chains and revenue.

The hospitality sector has been effectively affected also due to restrictions in the traveling sector. The decision that was taken to effectively shut down restaurants, hotels, cinemas, and theme parks all have had a significant impact on the worldwide tourism and hospitality industry.

The Discovery of New Ventures

Given the maturity level that was exhibited by the hospitality sector offering their venue available for hospital employees and beds has led to an effective rise in newer business opportunities and models that can take the world by storm if developed carefully. But given the present circumstances, it will be sagacious to maintain that the economy is in the nascent stage of recovery.

Given robust predictions of the third wave for India, it is quite likely that the hospitality sector will have to bear the brunt yet again. On the other hand, the consumer and producers’ confidence are at an all-time low. this does not spark much confidence in the future prospects of the hospitality sector.

Given, that the financial standing of the public has been crippled by the odious pandemic, healthcare spending, and burgeoning inflation in the economy, the hospitality sector for many can still be an item of luxury. Thus, such low demand responses in terms of the services of the hospitality sector don’t provide much encouragement to the investors to invest and help the hospitality sector recuperate.

What could help mitigate the disaster?

Various economists and analysts have recommended that having an extended cash flow for the next six months will be quite prudent for the sector in mitigating the debacle. On the other hand, developing resilience is the need of the hour. Given covid 19 has the characteristic of recurring, developing resilience through robust supply chains and amicably managing operators through payments to suppliers would indeed be effective.

In the scenario that presents itself, it is quite sagacious to cut down on all discretionary operational and capital expenditure. Thus, postponing maintenance and other not-so-important capital expenditure will effectively conserve cash.

the hospitality businessThough the pandemic might have crippled the service-oriented sector like the hospitality sector quite immensely, it is to be noted that the second source of woes in the sector is related to the government. This is due to the Government’s interventions that are significantly leading to uncertainty in the business. It can be rightly stated that given the government’s policies to revive the economy, there has been a great deal of ambiguity in the market.

The ambiguity is in the context of the economic and non-economic consequences that the government interventions might cause. In addition, the fear that has gripped the public’s attention is the uncertainty about whether the government has planned more future interventions that might effectively stall the business again.

In this spirit, various empirical studies have projected and shown that increased government policies ambiguity and spending have a direct correlation with the steady state of many macroeconomic variables. These macroeconomic variables include variables like GDP, debt, and consumption.

To summarize the arduous and odious problem, it can be rightly stated that during a crisis, the government has the most crucial role in reviving the economy. It is when the uncertainty prevails in the market or producers’ and consumers’ confidence is at a record low, that government investments need to be made. This is due to a very pertinent fact that the government faces the leading challenge in reducing both types of uncertainty i.e. economic and confidence.

Also, doing so is quite crucial and vital for industries as they are particularly sensitive to such uncertainties, such as the hospitality sector. To mitigate the ambiguity crisis, policymakers might as well just impose measures with detailed transparency even if they are long-term plans. This will promote certainty in the market. Certainty is quite crucial as ambiguity is loathed by businesses. Thus, ambiguity about future and current government spending including the stimulus packages even creates uncertainty in the volatile stock market.

This effectively disrupts, as aforementioned, many macroeconomic variables such as the GDP, debt, and consumption. In addition to its hospitality revival scheme, the government should also fine-tune its aid policy and help the tourism sector, as both, are interconnected. This will emphatically provide much-needed support for the hospitality sector.

For the consumers, the first step to reviving their confidence can be cutting taxes on fuel and managing inflation. This will help them prepare better for possible future government interventions if similar, subsequent epidemics such as COVID-19 plague the system ever again.


Tags: the hospitality business, business and hospitality, hospitality business, hospitality industry, restaurants hospitality, tourism and hospitality industry, hotel and hospitality, about hospitality industry, development of hospitality industry, business in hospitality industry, hospitality and tourism business, sector of the hospitality industry